British Go
Journal No. 18. October 1972. Page 14.
The 1972 British Championship.
Game 1 Best of 3.
Played on Saturday 23rd June.
Comments by John Diamond; edited by John Tilley.
(Y) = yes, (N) = no, show whether Haruyama, 6p, agrees or disagrees with
the comment.
Black: Tony Goddard, 4d
White: John Diamond, 4d
Komi: 5½
Time: 2 hours + 30 seconds byoyomi
The game-file in Ishi and
SGF format.
- White 6: Diamond prevents black from enclosing two corners, but
white's position on the left side is a little low.
- Black 9: Nearly always played as it keeps white 8 separated from 4
and therefore weak. The sequence 7 to 18 is very common.
- Black 19: Normal in this position as black must utilise the power
of his upper right corner. The joseki of A is not so aggresive.
- Black 21: Fujisawa Shuko played this move first and it is correct
although Diamond did not realise it.
- White 26: John Tilley feels this is incorrect as black B is too
good in conjunction with the upper right corner. C mmay be better but
white is now too low.
- Black 29: A typical Goddard move. Tony is an aggressive player and
he loves a difficult fight. It is possible to leave the joseki in the
upper left, (e.g. Honibo Shusai v. Go Sei-gen 1937 see Matsuda's Go
Letters) but joseki is to play at D. An analysis of the game in an
upstairs room felt that 29 was a bit loose.
- (Y) Black 31: Diamond feels that this is unnecessary as it destroys
the aji of 9.
- (Y) Black 33: Definitely bad, as black 34 could be useful much
later on. There is no point in protecting the opponent's weakness for
him.
- White 38: Diamond was unhappy about this as it strengthens black
too much. He suggested E after the game. Black's territory now becomes
secure.
- (Y) White 42: Diamond also regretted this move. It should have been
nobi at 58, because,
if Black plays 58, white 44 and black B is good for Goddard. 43 would
have been better at 58 therefore.
- (N) White 50: Diamond, worried by black's tremendous influence
leapt in at once. Afterwards Diamond regretted this move, but it is
difficult for white. Maybe an invasion around G?
- 52-76: White's four stones, clinging to the black mass at the top
of the board are weak, so they don't constitute a great threat to black
25 and 27. White 52 was unnecessary and black, by attacking well with 61
and 67, has done better than white.
(N) However, 71 should have been at 72 for a better shaped position. Now
white will have to struggle.
- 77-81: White's right side group is now much weaker as his escape
route to the centre is cut off.
- (N) White 82 may be wrong as it allows black a cut. Diamond feels
he should have played at 83 himself.
- (Y) White 84: A terrible move and now Diamond is in big trouble.
The vital point was F the eye stealing tesuji and centre of three
stones. It becomes apparent fairly soon how bad this move was.
- Black 89: White has no eyes now see Fig 2.
- White 90: Too good for white. 25 and 27 are in trouble. Possibly
black 87 was premature. Diamond is wriggling free.
Black now tries to patch his centre position, leaving 25 and 27 for
later.
Figure 2 (101-200)
                      
                        
                        
                       
                     
                       
                         
                   
                   
                     
                      
                      
                       
                       
                         
                        
                        
                       
                      
110 connects at , 116 connects at , 128 connects at 123.
|
The fighting is extremely involved and with white's cut at 112 both
black and white have two weak groups.
- White 114: A mistake better at 115. White can aim next at 114 and
black will be in trouble.
- (Y) Black 117: A superb move. It becomes apparent that white is
weaker than he seemed. White must protect at 118. He cannot cut at 119
or 120. White cannot connect at 135.
- (N) White 122: Wrong. If Diamond had played 130 immediately he
would have avoided Black 136, which could have killed the white group.
- White 124' should be played at 125 giving up two stones so that he
could get to the vital point of 136.
- (Y) White 136: The only move. Black had to play it earlier.
- (Y) White 144: White is now several moves ahead in the semeai. The position
is now:
| Black | White
|
38: Upper right
5-10: Lower right
10: Left
5-10: Lower left
|
10: Right (so he thinks)
20: Lower right
35: Upper left
10: Lower left
5: Komi
|
| 63: TOTAL | 80: TOTAL
|
However, White's right side group is still weak and if Goddard can kill
it he will win. The analysis upstairs led by Dr. Hattori, 5d, thought
that Goddard could capture siz stones in sente and, if Diamond tried to
save them, he would lose everything.
- White 148: With this move Diamond attacks black's centre to right
side group.
- Black 151: He cannot play 152 as white 156 threatens 151 and 157
simultaneously.
- Black 159: White could have played here himself, as it threatens
the black group.
- Black 161: At last!
- White 162: Popular opinion was that John Diamond could not play
here. He had to abandon six stones and make eyes on the edge. His group
is now struggling.
- Black 171: Black has to live as well. This move makes way for 175.
If black and white both live then black will be behind and cannot win.
Should Black have played 169' at A for the final ko? There are
conflicting opinions about black 165 some think that Tony lost his
chance there.
- 181-198: Difficult to evaluate. White seemed to gain a few points.
After 191 Tony Goddard was playing 30 seconds byoyomi.
Figure 3 (201-290)
                        
                     
                     
                   
                   
                    
                     
                       
                     
                    
                    
                         
                     
                      
                      
                      
                     
                        
                        
212 connects at black , 221 ko at black , 224 ko at 218, 227 at black , 247 connects at 214,
258 connects at black , 262 ko at white , 265 ko at black , 271 captures at 263, 272 retakes at white , 275 blocks at
white , 290
connects at 263.
[BGJ Fig 3 showed unnumbered 164 at 39.]
|
- White 214 started a hanami ko for white.
- White 226-228 gains 8 points.
- Black 235: A mistake due to time trouble.
- White 262: This ko is not as serious as it looks.
290 moves in all. White eon by 21 points. John Diamond also won the
second game to retain his British Championship.
The game shown here is fully analysed in the September
[1972] Go Review, by Haruyama, 6p. The key points are:
- 31: Bad: unnecessary.
- 33: Bad: unnecessary.
- 41: Poor move. the severe sagari at 42 is best, then white 76, black 58,
white captures below 39, black 41. The nobi is also better than 41.
- 43: Bad. Too much aji left behind. Agrees with Diamond's comment.
- 50: A good point!
- 54: Poor. Left of 51 correct.
- 67: Overplay. most of Goddard's troubles stemmed from this move.
Much better at 69.
- 82: Good: Also 84 good.
- 84: Unnecessarily risky.
- 97: Black missed a good tesuji.
Dia 1 captures one* stone in a loose Geta. See
Go Review for a superb tesuji sequence. (If you cannot work it out for
yourself.)
* [One stone or two? SGB.]
- 122: A good tesuji.
- 130: Tesuji.
- 136: Tesuji.
- 146: This fight is now a 4-move yose ko. Black is in real trouble.
- 154: It looks as if White suffered a mental breakdown at this
point. (Diamond still fails to comprehend this cruel remark.)
- 181: Black's last fling. White makes no mistakes and wins.
In conclusion, the key moves wre 41 and 43. Goddard had too many
weaknesses to protect his territory and the overplay of 67 snapped his
overstretched defences. A good game.
This article is from the
British Go Journal
Issue 18
which is one of a series of back issues now available on the web.
These pages are part of the
British Go Association
web site.
Last updated 2000-03-03
Email: bgj-earchive@britgo.org
Copyright © British Go Association 1972, 2000