(;GM[1]FF[4]CA[UTF-8]AP[CGoban:3]ST[2]
RU[Japanese]SZ[19]KM[0.00]
PW[CHH]PB[LCH]
;B[pd]
;W[dd]
;B[pq]
;W[dp]
;B[qk]
;W[mp]
;B[po]
;W[jp]
;B[fc]
;W[hc]
;B[cc]
;W[dc]
;B[cd]
;W[de]
;B[db]
;W[eb]
;B[cb]
;W[ec]
;B[cf]
;W[nc]
;B[pf]
;W[pb]
;B[qc]
;W[ld]
;B[cn]
;W[fp]
;B[bp]
;W[cq]
;B[dl]C[The starting position - What are the whole board considerations and how should white play?]
(;W[nq]C[A big point to defend the bottom side ?]
;B[df]
;W[cj]
;B[ck]
;W[dj]
;B[ff]
;W[fd]
;B[fk]TR[qi][hq]C[Black is under attack and this is considered unacceptble; the continuation is left unplayed. 
DW The key points triangled remain, presumably if the white group does escape black will be able to build up sufficient influence to gain from the attack, but this is not made explicit in the text.])
(;W[qm]C[Cut the RHS position straight away?]
(;B[pl]
;W[qp]
;B[pp]
;W[qo]
;B[qq]
;W[pm]
;B[om]
;W[rk]
;B[rj]
;W[rl]
;B[qj]
;W[rn]
;B[df]C[This is a failure for white, black has profited and retains sente to play d14])
(;B[pm]C[Black must not play here ]
;W[qn]
;B[pn]
;W[ql]
;B[pl]
;W[rk]
;B[qj]
;W[rj]
;B[qi]
;W[rp]C[This is a failure for black. 
DW if you compare with the previous diagram white makes a lot more points. The black wall is perfect but has  little value in this position.]))
(;W[qi]C[Cut the RHS position here ?]
;B[ok]
;W[oi]
;B[ph]
;W[pi]C[DW A middle game joseki, the 3 stones are weak but not that weak so black has to consider how to attack profitably, a direct attack on the 3 stones could backfire so black plays the big point at D14 ]
;B[df]
;W[ef]
;B[eg]
;W[ff]
;B[fg]
;W[gg]
;B[gf]
;W[fd]
;B[gh]
;W[hg]
;B[hh]
;W[ig]
;B[fi]TR[qm]C[This is given as a success for black with f11 given as strong). Also note that P9 protects against a white invasion at the triangled stone. 
DW Discussing this position with Jasper (Lingjun Miao) it is not clear how both players are to proceed. Territorially the game is not bad for white and it is not obvious how Black can profit  by attacking the 3 stones and it is white to play - it is left to the reader to fill in the gaps. As Jasper said, to really understand this book you will be close to professional strength! ])
(;W[cj]C[cut the LHS position ]
;B[ck]
;W[dj]
;B[df]
;W[ef]
;B[eg]
;W[ff]
;B[dh]C[White under attack, so for much the same reaons as the first diagram, this is rejected])
(;W[ok]C[erase right side ]
;B[df]
;W[qj]
;B[rj]
;W[rk]
;B[rl]
;W[pk]
;B[ql]
;W[ri]
;B[sk]
;W[ph]
;B[qb]C[The text says "Not bad but not good enough! " for white. 
DW The reader has to accept the verdict. that the left side is bigger than the right side.])
(;W[eg]C[left side erasure ]
(;B[lf]
;W[cg]
;B[bf]
;W[ok]C[The left side is the focus and white has a good position after P9
DW again the continuations are left for the reader to sort out.])
(;B[cg]C[Finally the game sequence ]
;W[qi]
;B[ok]C[Protecting against an invasion at R7]
;W[oi]
;B[ph]
;W[pi]C[This is the correct order of moves. White keeps the left side in check and plays first on the right side. ]
;B[hq]C[Black naturally plays the other invasion point ]
;W[dn]
;B[ip]
;W[jq]
;B[dm]
;W[io]
;B[ho]
;W[hn]
;B[go]
;W[in]
;B[gn]
;W[gm]
;B[en]
;W[bq]C[This is the game continuation. White goes on to win by 5 points. 
DW the thickness white builds on the bottom is indirectly helping the 3 stones on the RHS])))
