
British Go Journal No. 61. [1] March 1984. Page 13.
Problem (p13) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
This one comes from a recent professional game. Black 1 threatens to kill two stones on the side. White 2 is the kind of sinful play our grandmothers warned us against - it stops black from capturing anything while connecting along the edge - or does it? Five moves later White resigned - can you see why?
Answer on page 26b [2].
Links:
[1] http://www.britgo.org/bgj/bgj061.html
[2] http://www.britgo.org/bgj/06126b.html
[3] http://www.britgo.org/bgj/bgj.html